![]() Heck, I even like your suggestion of Talia being the traitor better than what we got even though I could never see her doing that (and she didn't actually take part in many council meetings such as deciding to save ryon or go after Gryff in episode 3) So, yeah, the traitor reveal was odd and underwhelming for me and seemed poorly thought out. ![]() They both seemed like such loyal and decent men to House Forrester, especially the former Lord Forrester through descriptions in the game, that it just seems odd they would lose faith in Rodrick because of hard times. The traitor being the non-Sentinel option seemed weak and petty. Either one I think would have a more decent reason to betray Rodrick, such as Lady Forrester wanting to save Ryon or the Maester doing it for any number of reasons (he always seemed untrustworthy and unloyal to me). I would have liked it better if the Maester or Lady Forrester were the traitor. The reasoning behind Duncan or Royland being the traitor seemed really half-assed. and if someone actually has brought this up already, my apologies. Talia is still a child, so such naïveté would be understandable. Sure, would've been really damn cold-hearted of Talia to demand their death, but. Then Duncan/Royland would take the blame to protect Talia. Maybe the girl would've received empty promises of Ryon's safety. I personally would have found it immensely more interesting and heartbreaking if, say, Talia turned out to be the traitor. How in the world would their betrayal aid house Forrester in any way or form? Deciding to ragequit because they didn't get their way. So I'm hoping we'll find out something more, big about the traitor in the future, because otherwise. ![]() Duncan even took a huge risk in sending Gared to the Wall. Royland was presented as a veteran, who'd been with House Forrester through thick and thin, and despite his militant and uhh "trigger happy" attitude, he never thought of nothing but what is best for the House.Īnd Duncan was someone SO deeply trusted that he was the only one allowed to know about the North Grove. So it felt strange that they'd become traitors, no matter what kind of a weak f*ckwad the new lord was. They were both presented as intensely loyal, not to mention very trusted people to Lord Gregor. weird, underwhelming, out of place? To me, neither Duncan or Royland had a good-enough motivation. I felt the identity of the traitor, either way, was really. For those who have not played through Episode 5, stop right now: Spoilers ahead. Okay, so, as a general discussion on the reveal of the traitor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |